Personal tools
Revision as of 23:15, 27 February 2011 by Csbelison (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search


This investigative thesis studied and analyzed the motivations behind the construction of the Metro Manila Development Authority‟s (MMDA) Pink Fences. The road structure – 6-foot pink wire mesh fences – emerged during Bayani Fernando‟s term as MMDA chairperson in response to the disorderly traffic situation in Metro Manila. Guided by the assumptions of Rational Choice Theory, Public Choice Theory and Biopolitics, this study explored the background and motivations that sparked the project and analyzed the involvement of public officials in its construction and implementation. In order to accomplish the study‟s objectives, the researchers followed the investigative “people trail” and “paper trail” by conducting focus interviews and archival research and employing textual analysis to analyze relevant data. The investigation showed that (1) the process undergone for the procurement of the project‟s materials was flawed and not uniform; (2) the pink fences, and other MMDA projects, were used by the administration party to advance its own interests; and (3) the construction of the pink fences served private interests and favored companies to a point of disadvantage to the government and disservice to public interest.

Cabreros, R.A., De Jesus C.P. (2010). The Other Side of the Fence: Investigating the Motivations behind the Metro Manila Development Authority’s Pink Fences, Unpublished Undergraduate Thesis, University of the Philippines College of Mass Communication.

Subject Index: Public officers--Philippines, Fences--Philippines

  • This page was last modified on 27 February 2011, at 23:15.
  • This page has been accessed 1,758 times.
The Fine Print: contents on this site are owned by whoever posted them (as indicated on the page History). Neither the DILC nor the University is responsible for them in any way. DILC reserves the right to delete them if they are deemed in violation of the University's Acceptable Use Policy and other applicable laws.